Home » Review

The Three Musketeers – Review (D)

The Three Musketeers Review 2011
Our Three Musketeers Review.
Starring: Milla Jovovich, Milla Jovovich, Milla Jovovich, Milla Jovovich, Milla Jovovich, Milla Jovovich
Directed by: Mr. Milla Jovovich

With director Paul W.S. Anderson’s track record ranging from ‘abysmal’ to ‘please kill me now’, it’s with some trepidation that we approach his latest ‘film’. All the usual hallmarks of the director are present and correct – pouty seductive female character played by his wife Milla Jovovich, plenty of slow motion and, last but not least, the ability to induce a coma in his audience.

So, it’s, like, the seventeenth century, right, and it’s set in France, yeah, and there’s these, like, musketeers, which are these guys who are really good at using swords and stuff. But they’re all bummed out because they were tricked by that bloke from Lord of the Rings and that bird from Resident Evil. And there’s this evil pope bloke who wants to trick King Louis into giving him power over the country and get into a massive scrap with the rest of Europe. And there’s this new kid who wants to be, like, a muske- swords bloke, and the bloke from Lord of the Rings has a massive boat with a hot air balloon attached to it. And the bad guy from Casino Royale is in it.

The Three Musketeers is less of a film and more a series of sword fights strung together with slow motion. Perhaps what’s most surprising is how much restraint is exercised on the part of Paul W.S. Anderson – there are some moments when the characters, like, talk and have conversations and set up the rest of the plot and stuff. But don’t worry, these things are dealt with quickly and efficiently and the sword fights soon resume.

For a film set in seventeenth century France, there are surprisingly few actual French people in the film. The actors are all American, English and German, with none of them even bothering to attempt a regional accent. Maybe that’s because the audience would have to listen to the dialogue instead of gazing in wonder at the locations used for filming. After all, we don’t want the audience to have to bother listening and having to decipher the incredibly complex French accent, do we?

The Three Musketeers limps from one ridiculous setpiece to another, such as Milla Jovovich abseiling down a building, or Milla Jovovich sliding on her knees underneath a volley of spiked balls, or Milla Jovovich leaping through a collection of razor-sharp wires. There’s something else about musketeers trying to save the king from blundering into a war with England, but that’s all window dressing to footage of Milla Jovovich getting undressed and leaping around places.

Of all the hateful characters, Logan Lerman’s D’Artagnan deserves special mention, if only because he’s so especially irritating. After being in France for five minutes, he manages to get into four duels with the best swordsmen in the land and assumes that he can beat them all. What’s worse is that the musketeers mistake his arrogance for talent, subjecting the audience to yet more scenes with the brat. The audience is expected to root for him simply because he wants to be a musketeer – even expected to support him when he challenges a man to a duel for insulting his horse. This is not character, this is poor writing.

Being a Paul W.S. Anderson film, The Three Musketeers naturally ends on a cliffhanger, lacking any sort of conclusion or even a pay-off for the previous two hours’ suffering. The credits might as well start rolling halfway through the film for all the closure the story provides, making The Three Musketeers a complete waste of time all round.

In short, The Three Musketeers is long, pointless, poorly written and so full of slow motion it’s like watching it underwater. In fact, it’s probably Paul W.S. Anderson’s best film to date.

Our Grade: D

Also See: Johnny English Reborn Review, Fright Night Review, 30 Minutes Or Less Review

Share This Post

From Around The Web


  • J.D.W. said

    Well apperently there are alot of “blokes” and blunders in this.
    I would frankly have to say…
    First I don’t think they should’ve remade this, espechially with all the versions of remakes of this in the past.
    Second:I’ll just stick with the originals, they were the best.

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • MC D said

    when I caught the trailer I was wondering why it was called the three musketeers when all you saw was Milla. Now I know why. Sometimes it’s not a good idea to have a director put his wife in everything he directs and this is the perfect case for that argument…I’ll stick to my DVD of The Three Musketeers from 93′ with K. Sutherland and C. Sheen thank you.

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • Remy Herrrero said

    I haven’t seen the movie yet, but will most likely see it Saturday. The slick production makes it entertaining for an audience in 2011, but the basic underlying story is timeless. The sense of personal honor causes a small group bound by loyalty to each other and ideals to rise to the occasion. Even though Alexandre Dumas’ story is fictional, it mirrors historical accounts such as Leonidas at Thermopylae, Basilone at Guadalcanal or Flight 97. This touches something that is very basic in all of us to admire those that display bravery. No matter how bad the acting or writing can be, the story will always allow us to enjoy it.

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • Adam Mason said

    Remy, none of what you said is in this film.

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • Luke said

    I saw this, I thought it was good. It wasn’t amazing, but it was good. Plus I know that some people out there don’t like reboots, but it’s the three musketeers. There like the monster movies, every generation gets one. I think if they were to do it agin they should get Robert downy jr, Johnny depp, & Tom hardy as the musketeers & gordon levit as d artagnan

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Leave A Comment

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

Pin It on Pinterest